Being BART
San Francisco’s Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system has had a very bad week. From August 11 to 15, it went from being a model for an efficient and responsible local transportation network to one that has been hacked and threatened with multiple civil-liberty lawsuits, and it faces an FCC investigation over public safety, among other things.
It began with a rumored protest planned for August 11 over the July 3 shooting of a man by transit police. The organizers of said protest were allegedly planning to co-ordinate their protests using mobile devices.
So BART decided to cut off cellphone service at some BART stations.
Per a BART-released statement on the wireless service interruption: “A civil disturbance during commute times at busy downtown San Francisco stations could lead to platform overcrowding and unsafe conditions for BART customers, employees and demonstrators. BART temporarily interrupted service at select BART stations as one of many tactics to ensure the safety of everyone on the platform.”
But that didn’t stop lawyers for the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation from threatening BART with lawsuits for illegally disrupting cellphone service. BART was publicly being compared to Hosni Mubarak for shutting down communications and social networks.
The hacker group Anonymous decided to weigh in and show its disapproval of BART’s strong-arm tactics by hacking the myBART.org website and leaking the names, passwords and personal data of more than 2,000 BART customers.
The kicker, however, was that the original rumored protest on August 11 never happened. But after all the controversy over the cellphone shutdown, BART did get a real three-hour protest on Monday, Aug. 15, 2011.
Protesters marched from the Civic Center BART Station to the Port of San Francisco building. BART had to shut down four stations for about an hour. This time, it did not disrupt cellphone service.
As the icing on BART’s week from hell, the FCC stepped in and is investigating what effect BART’s decision to shut down cellphone service might have had on public safety.
To add to BART’s pain, its own workers’ union pitched in with a call to the California Public Utilities Commission, BART’s regulator, to investigate software glitches, public and employee safety, and working conditions.
An Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU 1555) statement notes that in the past three months, BART’s computer system has crashed and station agents and transit operators have been repeatedly put at risk during security emergencies.
“We don’t have the solutions, but we definitely know something is wrong right now,” said Antonette Bryant, president and business agent, ATU 1555. “The people who run BART have lost our confidence and are putting rider and employee safety at risk. We need a thorough investigation by an outside, independent regulatory agency to find answers.”
It’s ironic that none of this would have happened if BART hadn’t tried to put rider and employee safety above the protesters’ rights.
Photo – mcmees24
Related posts:
Facebook, Social Media Used to Revive Egyptian Tourism
CalPoly Handbook – Social Media Best Tool for Sustainable Tourism
- If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
- Share
- No Comment



